Desmond Tutu: Giant of Grace

A pastor and member of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission remembers his friend, Archbishop Desmond Tutu. This interview took place in December 2020 for a story about Bible translation and reconciliation.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu in 2010. Photo: Nathan King / Alamy

Retired Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu died Sunday (26 December) at age 90. Tutu not only helped end apartheid in South Africa, but in the mid-1990s he chaired the country’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Those hearings brought black and colored victims and their families face to face with white authorities who had committed atrocities.

When apartheid ended, the world expected South Africa to descend into civil war, perhaps even genocide as blacks took revenge on their white oppressors.

Tutu saw a different path.

Prof. Piet Meiring preaches to the 2016 SIL ICON and Wycliffe Global Gathering participants in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

“He thought that through the love of Christ and by the process of grace, reconciliation would come about,” said Piet Meiring, a South African Reformed theologian and pastor whom Tutu appointed to the TRC.

As the commission prepared for its first hearings, Meiring remembers, friction arose over the leadership style of the man affectionately known as “Arch.”

“People said to him, ‘Look, Arch. You are not the Archbishop of Cape Town anymore. You are now chairperson of a commission that was launched by the state, by the parliament. You’re not working with the Bible, you’re working with an act of parliament under your arm. Please, no biblical references, no prayers and no hymn singing.’”

Tutu thought for a moment. “OK,” he said. “If that’s the way you want to do it, let’s try it.”

Meiring smiled as he continued the story. “But of course he still had his red cassock on, with his cross on his tummy.”

The hall where the hearings would be held was packed — family members, government officials, accused perpetrators. Tutu entered and, as he always did, greeted everyone within a hand’s reach. Then he approached the podium solemnly.

“I was directed by the Johannesburg office that this will be a secular hearing. We won’t pray. We won’t sing hymns. But let us allow ourselves to do what we do when we open Parliament nowadays. Let’s have a moment of silence for those who want to meditate before we start.”

After the quiet moment, Tutu started the meeting. The first victim entered and she was sworn in.

“Tutu was never at a loss for words, but he couldn’t start,” Meiring remembers. “He couldn’t speak. He was shifting in his chair back and forth. He cleared his throat for an uncomfortable three to four minutes.

“And then suddenly he looked up at the audience and said, ‘No, no, no! This is not the way to go back. We will pray. Close your eyes.”

“And then he prayed a wonderful prayer to Jesus Christ, who is the font of truth, to lead us, and to the spirit of God to guide us along the way. And when he said amen, he smiled and said, “Now we will sing.” And he found a well-known hymn, and the whole audience arose and they sang with him.

“And then Tutu smiled and said, “I think we are ready to start.”

Biblical roots

“Without the biblical message of peace and reconciliation, of the gift of grace, reconciliation becomes very, very difficult,” Meiring said. “South Africa had just discovered itself not only as a new, democratic country, but also as a secular country where the roles of the churches and the faith communities were played down a bit.

Tutu was so internationally revered that even those who opposed him realized that South Africa was still a religious country, too. “There’s no way by which you can talk about reconciliation and justice and forgiveness without reaching out to the deepest sources of your faith,” Meiring said.

“He was so fond of 2 Corinthians 5, where Paul pleads for reconciliation because God has reconciled us with Christ. And that was the example. But then Tutu very interestingly said, ‘But we Christians, we do not own everything.’ He called upon the Muslims and the Hindus and the Jewish community also to go back to the fountains of their faith to see what they could bring toward the process of reconciliation. Which they did.”

‘What about justice?’

Grace can be a hard message for people of any faith, Meiring said.

“Some people … said to Tutu and the others, ‘You are making things far too easy. You just say ‘Let us forgive and forget.’ It’s not that easy. What about justice? What about retribution? What about paying back what has been taken from you?’”

At the very last TRC hearing, faith communities were invited to talk about their own histories, confessing what needed to be confessed and then committing themselves to peace and reconciliation.

“That was quite an experience,” Meiring said, “having the white Afrikaans (Dutch Reformed) churches trying to explain why they fell for the apartheid theology and eventually came to their senses and asked for forgiveness for the pain they had inflicted upon others. And on the other side, the magnanimity and the grace of the other churches — often the churches of victims — who reached out and said, “If you confess, we accept your confession and we embrace you.”

“Tutu often said, ‘Remember, we ask for forgiveness, not for amnesia. We don’t want to whitewash what has happened in the past.’ I think we came to realize that grace and forgiveness do not come cheap. We saw wonderful examples of reconciliation in our process. It often went with times of anguish and real tears.”

 

Story: Jim Killam, Wycliffe Global Alliance

Related story from 2021: Stephen Coertze, the Wycliffe Global Alliance Executive Director, remembers his own powerful experience with grace and reconciliation in South Africa.

05/2025 Global

Special Report - May 2025

.

Read more

05/2025 Global

‘We’ve come very far, very fast’

A tech observer outlines what AI will mean soon for workplaces and ministry

Read more

Global

Tech pioneer: Christians ‘have to show up’ for AI

Silicon Valley pioneer Pat Gelsinger was CEO of Intel Corporation until December 2024. Quickly realising his career in technology was not finished, he joined the faith/tech platform Gloo in early 2025 as the executive chair and head of technology. He is also a general partner at the venture capital firm Playground Global. Gelsinger was instrumental in the development of cloud computing, Wi-Fi, USB and many other everyday technologies. He estimates his work has touched 60 to 70 percent of humanity. Here are highlights of his keynote talk at the 2025 Missional AI Summit. You can watch his entire talk here. Pat Gelsinger (left) is interviewed onstage by Steele Billings. Both are with Gloo. Watch the full interview here. Is technology good or bad? Technology is neither good nor bad. It’s neutral. It can be used for good. It can be used for bad. … If you think back to the Roman roads, why did Christ come when he came? I’ll argue the Pax Romana and the Roman roads. … The greatest technology of the day was the Roman road system. It was used so the Word could go out. Historical example I will argue Martin Luther was the most significant figure of the last thousand years. And what did he do? He used the greatest piece of technology available at the day, the Gutenberg printing press. He created Bibles. … He broke, essentially, the monopoly on the Bible translations …. He ushered in education. He created the systems that led to the Renaissance. That’s a little punk monk who only wanted to get an audience with the pope because he thought he had a few theological errors. I’ll argue (Luther was) the most significant figure of the last thousand years, using technology to improve the lives of every human that he touched at the time. How today compares to the dawn of the internet AI is more important. AI will be more significant. AI will be more dramatic. … This is now incredibly useful, and we’re going to see AI become just like the internet, where every single interaction will be infused with AI capabilities.  In the 75-year-or-so history of computing, we humans have been adapting to the computer. … With AI, computers adapt to us. We talk to them. They hear us. They see us for the first time. And now they are becoming a user interface that fits with humanity. And for this and so many other reasons that every technology has been building on the prior technology, AI will unquestionably be the biggest of these waves, more impactful even than the internet was. On the need for AI development to be open-source It is so critical because we’re embedding knowledge, embedding values, embedding understanding into those underlying models, large language models and every aspect that happens. It must be open, and this is part of what I think is critical about us being together here today. We need to be creating trusted, open, useful AI that we can build humanity on.  On the need for Christians to help build AI systems We have to show up as the faith community to be influencing those outcomes, because remember what happened in the social media. We didn’t show up, and look at what we got. So are we going to miss this opportunity for something that’s far more important than social networking with AI? Where it truly in the models embeds every aspect of human history and values into it? We have to show up, team. What we do with large language models is far more important because truly we are choosing how we embody knowledge of all time into those underlying models. They need to be open. They need to be trusted. What Christians must bring to the process If we’re going to show up to influence AI broadly, we have to show up with good engineering, good data, good understanding, good frameworks. How do you measure things like ‘Is that leading to better character? Is that leading to better relationships? Is that creating better vocational outcomes? Is that a valid view of a spiritual perspective?’ We need good underlying data associated with each one of these. And for that we’re actively involved. We’re driving to create that underlying data set. Because we need to show up with good data if we’re going to influence how AI is created. How should this work? For the AI systems we need to create good benchmarks. If I ask about God, does it give me a good answer or not? If I ask about relationships with my children, does it give me good answers? We need to create the corpus of data to give good answers to those questions. And, armed with that good data, we need to show up to influence the total landscape of AI. We want to benchmark OpenAI. We’re going to benchmark Gemini. We’re going to benchmark Claude. We’re going to benchmark Copilot.  This is what we’re going to do at Gloo, but we want to be part of a broader community in that discussion so that we’re influential in creating flourishing AI. Technology is a force for good. AI that truly embeds the values that we care about, that we want to honour, that we want to be representing into the future and benchmarking across all of them.   Oh his role with Gloo We are going to change the landscape of the faith community and its role in shaping this most critical technology, AI, for faith and flourishing. That’s what we’re going to do at Gloo and we need all of your help and partnership to do so because if we don’t hang together, we’re not going to influence the outcome, right? ‘Here am I, Lord’ I don’t think I’m done. … You and I both need to come to the same position like Isaiah did. Here am I, Lord. Send me. Send me. Send us. That we can be shaping technology as a force for good. That we could grab this moment in time. This is the greatest time to live in human history. We’re going to solve diseases. We’re going to improve lives. We’re going to educate every person in poverty. We are going to solve climate issues. We are going to be using these technologies to improve the lives of every human on the planet. We are going to shape technology as a force for good. Here am I, Lord. Send me. ••• Story: Jim Killam, Wycliffe Global Alliance Translated with ChatGPT. How was the translation accuracy? Let us know at info@wycliffe.net. Alliance organisations are welcome to download and use images from this series.  

Read more